Legal Resource Center

What is Defamation?

Defamation is the making of a false statement concerning a person or business that damages that person’s or business’s reputation. If a false statement is made and that person or business’s reputation is damaged, there can be legal consequences for the person who made the statement. Defamation can mean many things. Defamation applies to both written and oral statements that are published to third parties. Publication includes the posting of material on the Internet. Defamation can either be a statement that is verbal or written. If a defamatory statement is made verbally, it’s called slander. If a defamatory statement is published in writing, it’s called libel.   Types of Defamatory False Speech:


Elements Required for a Defamation Lawsuit

In order to sue someone for a defamatory statement, there are six elements that must be satisfied:

  1. The statement must be false. If the statement is true, the person making the statement will be protected from liability.
  2. The statement cannot be privileged. There are many situations were a statement may be protected by privilege. For example, if the statement repeats material from a court proceeding, or other public documents, the statement is privileged. Privileged statements are not subject to liability in a lawsuit.
  3. The statement cannot be an opinion. Statements that cannot be proven to be true or false and are opinion cannot for the basis of a claim for defamation. If a statement can be proven or disproven by objective fact and the statement is false, a person may be liable for defamation.
  4. The statement must be “published.” The statement must be heard or read by someone other than the person the statement is about. For example, a private e-mail between two parties is not defamation. However, if the e-mail is sent to co-workers, friends, or is posted for others to see on the internet, then this likely qualifies as publication for purposes of defamation.
  5. The statement must actually cause reputational damage. Statements about someone that would make others not want to associate with them, accuses them of a crime, having a loathsome disease, or concerns a person being unchaste are all examples of defamatory statements that cause actual reputational harm.
  6. The statement must be believable by a reasonable person. If one cannot seriously believe the statement was true, it does not constitute defamation.

Defamation Per Se

In some circumstances a statement will always be considered defamatory and will be assumed to harm a person’s reputation without the need to provide proof of harm. These types of statements are referred to as being defamation “per se.” Statements that qualify as being defamation per se typically involve falsely statements regarding: a criminal offense, a loathsome disease, a persons business or professional occupation or trade, or sexual infedelity/misconduct.

Remove Defamation from the Internet

Lawsuits resulting from defamatory statements made on the Internet are on the rise. If you believe that you or your business is a victim of a defamatory statement made on the internet, contact the experienced internet defamation attorneys at Meyers Roman Friedberg & Lewis, LPA to evaluate your case. The laws regarding defamation vary depending on the state. In many instances, it is possible for an attorney to completely remove defamatory statements from the web. Call (216) 373-7706 today to find out more information.

How to Identify (and Remove) Fake Online Business Reviews

Are Fake Online Reviews Hurting your Business? Find out what you can do about it.   What to do if your Business is being Attacked by Fake Reviews The Internet has become an essential part of our lives. Almost everything we do is connected to the Internet in...
Read More

When Free Speech Clash with Rules of Conduct

Imagine you're at a sporting game with your children. It's a great way to spend time with the family. You have good seats and your team is even winning. It's looking to be a great day. Then, the guy in front of you takes off his shirt to reveal his highly offensive...
Read More

Attorney Aaron Minc interview on Cleveland News 5

Ohio failed to pass Bill 353 to join 38 other states and Washington DC to criminalize Revenge Porn.  Mona Kosar from Cleveland 5 news interviews Aaron Minc about this and the latest Revenge Porn making headlines between Rob Kardashian and his former fiancee Blac...
Read More

What Is Tortious Interference?

Tortious interference is one of those legal terms that sounds a lot more complicated than it is. Bryan A. Garner, the author of the Dictionary of Modern Legal Usage, once explained the concept to the legendary New York Times wordsmith William Safire.  "Say you had a...
Read More

Revenge Porn: How to Fight Back [50 State Interactive Map]

Of all the posts I’ve written in my years of running this blog, few have gotten more traffic and response than an article I wrote three years ago on revenge porn. It focused on the malicious revenge porn site,, which posts intimate, personal and sometimes...
Read More