Legal Resource Center

What is Using the Name or Likeness of Another?


Using the name of likeness of another occurs when a business or individual uses someone’s name, photograph, or other defining attributes or “likeness” for commercial purposes, such as advertising or other promotional activities. It may also occur when a person’s identity is used by another for the other person’s own personal benefit, whether or not the purpose is strictly commercial. There are two distinct legal claims that apply to these kinds of unauthorized uses.

The first type of claim is invasion of privacy through misappropriation of name or likeness. The second is the violation of the right of publicity. The right of publicity is the right of a person to control and make money from the commercial use of his identity.


Elements of a Claim for Unlawful Use of Name or Likeness

A plaintiff must generally establish three elements to sue for an unlawful use of name or likeness:

• Use of a Protected Attribute: The plaintiff must show that the defendant used an aspect of the plaintiff’s identity that is protected by the law, like their name or likeness (distinguishable aspects of a person’s identity);

• The Use was for an Exploitative Purpose: The plaintiff must show that the defendant used the plaintiff’s name, likeness, or other personal attributes for commercial, personal, or other exploitative purposes. The use of someone’s name or likeness for news reporting is not exploitative.

• The Plaintiff did not give Consent: The plaintiff must establish that he or she did not give permission to use their likeness.


Defenses to Using the Name or Likeness of Another

Consent is a defense to a legal claim for misappropriation of name or likeness or violation of the right of publicity. If the plaintiff gave oral or written consent to the use of name or likeness of another then the defendant will not be liable for the publication. However, the publication must not exceed the consent. Further, the plaintiff that originally had the consent can revoke that consent anytime before the use of their name or photograph takes place.

The second defense is the statute of limitations has expired. This term describes the maximum amount of time the plaintiff can wait before bringing a lawsuit. In using the name or likeness of other cases, the statute of limitations ordinarily runs from the date of first publication of the offending facts. It is common to be anywhere from one to three years.
A third defense is use of name or likeness for news or commentary. A defendant will generally not be held liable for using someone’s name, likeness, or other personal attributes in connection with reporting on matters of public interest.


Damages for Using the Name or Likeness of Another

One who has established a cause of action for invasion of his or her privacy is entitled to recover damages. The three most common are:

• The damage or harm to the defendant because of the publication.
• The mental distress suffered if it is of a kind that normally results from such a publication.
• The special damages experienced by the defendant because of the publication. These special damages include damages for loss of reputation or community status, damages for physical injury or demonstrable pecuniary loss, and consortium loss by the spouse.

The law of using the name or likeness of another is complex. If you believe that you are a victim of this tort, contact the experienced attorneys at Meyers Roman Friedberg & Lewis, LPA to evaluate your case. The laws regarding using the name or likeness of another vary depending on the state. Call today (216) 831-0042 to find out more information.

How to Identify (and Remove) Fake Online Business Reviews

Are Fake Online Reviews Hurting your Business? Find out what you can do about it.   What to do if your Business is being Attacked by Fake Reviews The Internet has become an essential part of our lives. Almost everything we do is connected to the Internet in...
Read More

When Free Speech Clash with Rules of Conduct

Imagine you're at a sporting game with your children. It's a great way to spend time with the family. You have good seats and your team is even winning. It's looking to be a great day. Then, the guy in front of you takes off his shirt to reveal his highly offensive...
Read More

Attorney Aaron Minc interview on Cleveland News 5

Ohio failed to pass Bill 353 to join 38 other states and Washington DC to criminalize Revenge Porn.  Mona Kosar from Cleveland 5 news interviews Aaron Minc about this and the latest Revenge Porn making headlines between Rob Kardashian and his former fiancee Blac...
Read More

What Is Tortious Interference?

Tortious interference is one of those legal terms that sounds a lot more complicated than it is. Bryan A. Garner, the author of the Dictionary of Modern Legal Usage, once explained the concept to the legendary New York Times wordsmith William Safire.  "Say you had a...
Read More

Revenge Porn: How to Fight Back [50 State Interactive Map]

Of all the posts I’ve written in my years of running this blog, few have gotten more traffic and response than an article I wrote three years ago on revenge porn. It focused on the malicious revenge porn site,, which posts intimate, personal and sometimes...
Read More